![]() ![]() Received an un-encrypted INVLID-PAYLOAD-TYPE notify message, dropping But, after the SA lifetime period runs out (8 hrs) and it goes to re-establish (re-key) a connection I get an error from my ASA router stating:ĭuplicate Phase 1 packet detected. When I establish my IPSEC connection for the first time everything connects fine. I have the TL-WE604W's at each of the 19 different locations. So my main router that I have 19 different locations connecting to is a Cisco ASA 5510. sla admonisher 1 type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.1.2.Firmware Version : 1.1.0 Build 20141031 Rel.32628s ![]() ![]() here ’ s a config to ping an IP over the burrow every 5 seconds, constantly. ![]() Using sla monitor we can have the ASA do a continuous ping over the burrow to keep it always up. #Qm fsm error p2 struct licenseTo go back to alone permitting our entirely two subnets we can do this : access-list ACL-AWS-FILTER extended license information science 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.202.0 255.255.255.0 access-list ACL-AWS-FILTER extended permit information science 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.204.0 255.255.255.0 access-list ACL-AWS-FILTER extended deny information science any any group-policy GRP-AWS-FILTER internal group-policy GRP-AWS-FILTER attributes vpn-filter value ACL-AWS-FILTER tunnel-group 77.88.99.100 general-attributes default-group-policy GRP-AWS-FILTER die If using ‘ any ’ is besides broad for your needs you can restrict traffic another way. Read more: Top 9 how do i get boba fett master coin in 2022 Optional: Restrict subnets you don’t want in the tunnel To do this we have to use the sla monitor commands. The ASA needs to keep this burrow up all the time so AWS can initiate traffic back to the ASA. This plainly makes it so there is only one SA for this burrow. This placid doesn ’ thymine allow users on the AWS side to initiate the burrow. The any rule is besides used thus the security association will include the ASA outside interface where the SLA monitor traffic will be sourced from. If you specify more than one introduction for this ACL without using “ any ” as the source, the VPN will function erratically. If you do not wish to use the “ any ” beginning, you must use a unmarried access-list introduction for accessing the VPC image. This access tilt should contain a inactive route corresponding to your VPC CIDR and allow traffic from any subnet. Here is AWS ’ south explanation of why this is : I was able to change the line to merely be this : access-list ACL-AWS-VPN extended license information science any4 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 however, when making a burrow to AWS, THIS WILL NOT WORK! Amazon AWS requires merely a individual line to be on the tunnel ACL. Our future steps is to compare our ACL with the remote control side ’ randomness ACL or VPN dealings definition. The “ 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 ” is telling us that the outback side has something else defined in their VPN dealings definition. The interface this is coming in on is our outside interface. The peer we are trying to connect to is 77.88.99.100. We can understand this by analyzing the mistake message “ IP = 77.88.99.100, Rejecting IPSec tunnel : no matching crypto map submission for distant proxy 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 local proxy 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 on interface OUTSIDE ”. Phase 1 was establishing correctly but the interesting traffic wasn ’ thymine matching any crypto map I had defined so it wouldn ’ t create Phase 2. Session type : LAN-to-LAN, Duration : 0h:00m:00s, Bytes xmt : 0, Bytes rcv : 0, Reason : crypto map policy not found ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |